Avion

Posts

Top 5 failed fighter jets

The fighter jet success can be determined by many factors – its performance, sales, arm load capacity, maneuverability and combat effectiveness, But a jet has to be accepted into service first by approved by respective aerospace firm like FAA, DGCI. Thus, it is only natural that the most unsuccessful fighter jets are the ones that never left the drawing board or went beyond the prototype stage. Of course, many potentially successful jets do not enter production because of economic, political, or other non-aviation-related reasons. For example many late Soviet projects did not see mass production due to budgetary reasons after the collapse of the Soviet Union: the supersonic VTOL Yak-41 and Mikoyan’s fifth-generation attempt, the 1.44, among them. Those are not failures – they are results of changing situation around the project To be considered a failure, the jet has to fail because of its design or manufacturing defects or not able to withstand the varying atmospheric conditions. But

Boeing T-7 Red Hawk

T -7 Red Hawk The Boeing/Saab T-7 Red Hawk, originally known as the Boeing T-X, is an American/Swedish advanced jet trainer produced by Boeing in partnership with Saab. It was selected on 27 September 2018 by the United States Air Force (USAF) as the winner of the T-X program to replace the Northrop T-38 Talon Role Advanced Trainer National origin United States/Sweden Manufacturer Boeing/Saab Status In Production Primary User US Air Force First Flight 20 December 2016 Number Built 2 The T-7A Red Hawk is all-new advanced pilot training system designed for the U.S. Air Force that will train the future pilots of next generation fighter and bomber planes. The Red Hawk builds off the legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen, paying tribute to the legends of the past and the heroes of the future. Designed using a digital thread, the T-7A aligns with the U.S. Air Force’s Digital Century Series strategy by enabling the integration of new concepts and capabilities faster and more affordably through

Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS)

MCAS, or Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, provides consistent airplane handling characteristics in a very specific set of unusual flight conditions. MCAS now contains multiple enhanced protections: Measurements from two Angle of Attack (AOA) sensors will be compared. Each sensor will submit its own data to the airplane’s flight control computer. MCAS will only be activated if both sensors agree. MCAS will only be activated once. MCAS will never override the pilot’s ability to control the airplane using the control column alone. MCAS ON 737 Max The Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) flight control law was implemented on the 737 MAX to mitigate the aircraft's tendency to pitch up because of the aerodynamic effect of its larger, heavier, and more powerful CFM LEAP-1B engines and nacelles. The stated goal of MCAS, according to Boeing, was to provide consistent aircraft handling characteristics at elevated angles of attack in certain unusual

ATA Chapters

Air transportation Association (ATA) published a numbering system to learn and understand the technical features of an Aircraft The standard numbering system was published by the Air Transport Association on June 1, 1956. While the ATA 100 numbering system has been superseded, it continued to be widely used until it went out of date back in 2015, especially in documentation for general aviation aircraft, on aircraft Fault Messages (for Post Flight Troubleshooting and Repair) and the electronic and printed manuals. This commonality permits greater ease of learning and understanding for pilots , aircraft maintenance technicians , and engineers . The Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code Tables was a modified version of the Air Transport Association of America (ATA), Specification 100 code. It was developed by the FAA's, Regulatory Support Division (AFS-600). This code table was constructed by using the new JASC code four digit format, along with an abbreviate